Webpage comments

Comments
Filter comments list
 All (0) |
 Mine (0) |
 Pending (0) |
 Approved (0) |
 Spam (0) |
 Trash (29)
Search Comments:
Select bulk action
Filter by comment type
Comments list navigation
29 items « ‹ Current Page
1
of 2 Next page› Last page»
Comments list
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
Select
commen
t
John
workin4alvn@gmail.com
97.94.50.90
Why are comments
and questions being
deleted?
Thought this was an
open forum.
Who is afraid of the
comments being made
or the facts being
stated?
Spam | Restore |
Delete Permanently
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsVie
w Post—No
comments
2022/09/2
2 at 6:53
pm
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
Select
commen
t
Doug Tylee
tyleedoug@gmail.com
24.183.123.25
Someone didn’t like
the comments. I
wonder who.
Spam | Restore |
Delete Permanently
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsVie
w Post—No
comments
2022/09/2
2 at 1:45
pm
Select
commen
t
Ann
ann55398@yahoo.com
96.3.2.90
May I ask where all
the concerned citizens
posts went?
Spam | Restore |
Delete Permanently
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsVie
w Post—No
comments
2022/09/2
2 at 12:30
pm
Select
commen
t
Test
test@gmail.com
173.248.48.122
test
Spam | Restore |
Delete Permanently
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsVie
w Post—No
comments
2022/09/2
2 at 9:24
am
Select
commen
t
Chris Wilson
CMWILSON2006@HOTMAIL.C
OM
23.30.234.49
I’m considering this
area in purchasing a
lot for vacation use.
Loch Lomond is just
beautiful! Is there a
minimum square foot
requirement for
building? Is there a
separate area for the
campers you
mentioned above? My
only concern is
whether they will be in
my field of view. Are
you any closer to
resolving the above
mentioned issues?
Thank you
Spam | Restore |
Delete Permanently
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsVie
w Post—No
comments
2022/09/2
2 at 7:49
am
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
Select
commen
t
Group Member
groupmember@gmail.com
52.205.140.168
To the Town of Cedar
Lake residents, the
following letter was
written by the Town
chairman and posted
on the Town website
Sept. 12, 2022. We, as
concerned citizens of
the Town, would like
to set the record
straight. The fact that
the letter written by
the chairman is full of
assumptions designed
to paint a specific
picture and untruths in
order to sway the
voters of the Town to
meet his personal
agenda. This agenda
consists of passing an
ordinance in order to
charge campers in the
Town an extra
$300.00 fee per year
and impose fines if
they do not comply
with his specific set of
rules. He is mainly
targeting the people
who own land in the
Loch Lomond Beach
Club Association,
which is where he
lives. The fact is the
landowners in LLBC
are taxed according to
the value of their land,
whether they use it for
camping, a summer
cabin, or have a yearround home, per the
State of Wisconsin!
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsVie
w Post—No
comments
2022/09/2
1 at 12:16
pm
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
The Zoning in LLBC
is
Residential/Recreation
al and allows people to
camp on their land
with a land use RV
dwelling permit from
Barron County. There
is no denying the fact
that the chairman is
trying to use his
position to expand the
size of the township
government in order to
try and drive what he
deems a lesser class of
property owners from
his neighborhood.
Update on
Recreational
Residential Dwellings
September 12, 2022
Subject: Update on
recreational residential
Dwellings
The Town of Cedar
Lake Chairman
consulted with WTA
attorneys and the
Town’s municipal law
attorney after the
August 8, 2022 town
board meeting. Their
advice was that we do
not commit time and
effort to a non
–
bonding referendum in
November based on
the current board’s
refusal to take action
during the past 15
months. They stated
that it would be better
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
to seek candidates for
the upcoming April
election that are
willing to be proactive
in resolving this issue.
While this is probably
true that he consulted
with the WTA he was
most likely told that in
order to continue his
crusade against this
group of property
owners he needs to try
to get new board
members to promote
his radical agenda.
Currently the other
two supervisors are
against the proposed
ordinance and
expanding the size of
the township’s role in
the daily lives of its
taxpayers. It is also
true that 3 board
members have
contacted the WTA
attorneys and their
first response was,
“This may not even be
legal and if it is passed
it will probably open
the Town up to many
lawsuits!”
The two main issues
related to the
unmanaged growth of
the LLBC unlicensed
campground continue
to be increased zoning
violations and revenue
inequities.
The reason that LLBC
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
does not have a license
to be a campground is
because it is not a
campground. The
State of Wisconsin has clear language that
defines a campground
and LLBC does not
even remotely fall
under the definition
due to the fact LLBC
does not own or rent
out the individual
properties that are
used for camping. The
County Zoning of the
properties within
LLBC is
Residential/Recreation
al which allows for
property owners to
camp on their
property. The
Chairman cites zoning
violations as one of
the reasons for his
agenda, but these
violations are very few
and frankly just
nitpicking by a small
group of his
supporters, of which
the County is working
on these few
violations, as they
should. There are no
revenue inequities due
to the fact that the
people who own the
land with campers on
are paying their fair
share of taxes based
on the value of their
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
land set up by a
statewide system.
Specifically, the
increased potential for
irreversible
environmental damage
to Red Cedar Lake,
and the increased
property tax burden
placed upon
permanent
homeowners
throughout the
Township.
The accusation that
campers are somehow
environmentally
irresponsible makes it
clear that the chairman
is trying to categorize
anyone that camps as
being of a lessor class
than a property owner
on the lake. These
types of accusations
should be concerning
to every resident in the
township. Most of the
lots camped on are
quite a distance from
the Red Cedar Lake. If
there is any
environmental damage
to the lake, it can be
easily argued that
damage is being
caused by the
numerous houses and
cabins that each have
their own private wells
and septic systems as
close as 75 feet from
the lakeshore. The
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
land that campers are
on is in no way
causing a tax burden
on homeowners! If
anything the bare land,
being sold and
improved with
driveways and
electricity, are
increasing the tax base
for the Town.
Facts bearing on the
problem:
1. Numerous reported
zoning violations
remain unresolved at
the Barron County
level, although it is not
their responsibility to
do what the state
would be required to
do if LLBC was a
licensed campground.
The violations are not
only few, but
relatively minor for
the whole Town of
Cedar Lake. It is
concerning that the
group supporting the
chairman is singling
out the property
owners that camp
within LLBC and
ignoring the rest of the
properties and
township.
2. LLBC reported
“record property
sales” in their August
2022 newsletter.
The record sales are a
good thing for the
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
Town, because these
were bare lots and
now have
improvements, with
quite a few of the lot
owners building
cabins or year
-round
homes, thus increasing
the Town tax base.
When the Town
Chairman submitted a
request for
information via email,
the LLBC President
responded with the
following via email:
“Angie should be able
to get this information
sometime between
closing of the club for
the season and the
opening of the club
next year”
3. On June 1, 2021,
LLBC reported 262
lots with campers and
314 homes/cabins. On
Sept. 9, 2022 the
LLBC reported the
following membership
correspondence:
“For 2022 Divisions 1,
2 & 3 campers are
required to be
removed from lots.
For these 3 divisions
there are
approximately 118
members that camp.”
Until the LLBC
reports the total
number of campsites
within their
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
subdivision, or until
Delmore Consulting is
contracted to verify
the number of
Campsites, it is
reasonable to assume
the following:
12 divisions total x
118 campsites/3
divisions = 472
campsites. Therefore,
today there are
approximately 475
campsites compared to
approximately 325
homes within the
LLBC subdivision.
There were 262
campsites in in June
2021 compared to 472
campsites in August
2022. This is an increase of 210
campsites during the
past 15 months.
The chairman is again
using misconception
to try and convince the
residents of Cedar
Lake that tragedy is
just around the corner
due what he considers
a substandard class of
property owners. Well,
his assumptions are all
wrong! As of today
checking with some of
the LLBC board
members and the
manager there are 280
members who have
campers on their lots.
Many of those lots
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
sold were double and
triple lots, thus
creating their own
“greenspace” but
having only one
camper for all of their
lots.
4. This unmanaged
growth of unlicensed
campsites generates
the following
questions:
When is enough,
enough? Will another
100 or 200 more
unlicensed campsites
be allowed before
action is taken even
through homeowners
currently paying 94%
of all township
expenses and
unlicensed campsites
pay only 6% of all
township expenses?
The owners of the
campers are also
wondering when is
enough, enough? The
Town hall has been
filled with the owners
of these camper lots,
trying to voice their
opinions against such
an ordinance of an
unfair tax of $300.00
every year. Yes, the
homeowners bear the
majority of the tax
burden, as it is
everywhere in the
State of Wisconsin!
You wouldn’t expect a
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
person with a $2
million dollar lake
home to be taxed the
same as someone
owning a half-acre lot
in the woods with a
camper on it!
Why are non
-residents
given priority over
residents?
The truth is, they are
not given priority!
Many of our lake
homeowners are not
residents either. Non
–
residents are not allowed to vote in the
Town! But other than
that, they have the
same rights as all
property owners! We
should be welcoming
all these non
-residents
for sharing our tax
burden and keeping
our local economy
humming!
Will it take the actions
of private citizens to
resolve, through court
proceedings, what
elected officials refuse
to resolve?
The main job of any
Town in the State of
Wisconsin is to
maintain all the Town
roads. It is not the job
of a Town to impose a
land tax on the
landowners in a
subdivision such as
LLBC! These
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
landowners are paying
dues to the LLBC
every year, besides
their taxes. Dues for
the year of 2022 was
$640.00. Paying
another fee of $300.00
to the Town is another
example of big
government and could
be a hardship on many
of these young
families just wanting
to enjoy their
vacations or weekends
on their own land.
Will the current
LLBC’s board of
director’s decision to
risk everything, rather
than encourage Town
of Cedar Lake elected
officials to adopt the
proposed recreational
residential dwellings
ordinance, result in
numerous lawsuits
from parcel owners
against the LLBC
board of directors,
various realtors, land
developers, and others
if the court’s decision
on the pending private
lawsuit is to mandate
the removal of
campers.
Kenneth J. Leners
Chairman, Town of
Cedar Lake
Well, I still maintain
the business of the
LLBC is not the
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
business of the Town
of Cedar Lake. The
Town’s main job is
maintain our roads and
with today’s rising
costs of everything, it
would seem we have
our plate full!
Concerned Citizens of
The Town of Cedar
Lake
Spam | Restore |
Delete Permanently
Select
commen
t
Liz Schulte
lizschulte05@gmail.com
65.132.218.218
In reply to ken.
Chairman Leners,
Disrespectful? The
Town needs to stop
trying to regulate
camper use out of
existence. Increased
zoning violations and
irreversible damage to
Red Cedar Lake?
What you say in your
letter is wrong and
“fake news”. Stop
targeting legal land
use. Liz Schulte
Spam | Restore |
Delete Permanently
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsVie
w Post—No
comments
2022/09/2
1 at 11:36
am
Select
commen
t
Liz Young
learning2fly4@yahoo.com
73.5.145.85
In reply to Ken
Leners.
Mr. Leners, please
explain how my
difference of opinion
equates to disrespect.
Spam | Restore |
Delete Permanently
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsVie
w Post—No
comments
2022/09/2
1 at 11:21
am
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
Select
commen
t
Liz Schulte
lizschulte05@gmail.com
65.132.218.218
In reply to ken.
Test
Spam | Restore |
Delete Permanently
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsVie
w Post—No
comments
2022/09/2
1 at 11:15
am
Select
commen
t
Lori Masters
lorimasters2125@gmail.com
73.54.122.20
This statement by the
Town of Cedar Lake
Chairman concerns me
on so many issues;
untruths, the lack of
freedom of speech for
comments; but most of
all his blatant calling
out for the removal of
his duly elected fellow
board members.
Spam | Restore |
Delete Permanently
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsVie
w Post—No
comments
2022/09/2
0 at 10:08
pm
Select
commen
t
Ann
ann55398@yahoo.com
96.3.2.90
Chairman Leners,
First of all, I haven’t
read anything that was
written that is
disrespectful. Freedom
of speech allows
citizens to provide
comments and have
their opinions heard.
It is obvious you are
inflating numbers and
not being truthful in
your information and
data. Let the county
deal with county
zoning issues, let the
state deal with state
tax issues. You as a
township elected
official should be
dealing with township
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsVie
w Post—No
comments
2022/09/2
0 at 10:06
pm
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
issues. Take the roads
for example or proper
signage of street
addresses in LLBC to
name a couple. As a
land owner, we pay
our fair share of
assessed taxes, pay for
proper permits
required by the county
and obtain all required
documentation needed
for LLBC. When was
the last time your
taxes were properly
assessed? I am not
sure about you but my
taxes have more then
doubled in the last
year and I expect them
to increase again this
year with recent
improvements. When
was the last time your
septic system was
inspected? Do you
know the true
intention of many of
us land owners in
LLBC? Have you
thought that maybe we
are working towards
building and making
the Town of Cedar
Lake our place of
residence?
It is too bad there are a
few individuals that
are so miserable and
would waste so much
valuable time
worrying about things
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
that have no affect on
them. If you or others
don’t like living in a
recreational zoned
development, maybe
you should have
thought about that
before you purchased
your property.
Seasonal landowners
bring much revenue to
the area each summer
which helps local
businesses survive in a
small
Community. As an
elected official you are
to look out for the best
interest of all
landowners. I am sure
you were not elected
to put all your time
and effort into the
LLBC lawsuit or your
agenda when there are
things to be dealt with
at a town level.
Chairman Leners I
hope as many of us
concerned property
owning citizens voice
our options, we can
open the eyes of voters
in the Town of Cedar Lake to help them
understand your
untruthful data as you
try to sway them to
your personal agenda.
It is time citizens and
elected officials stand
up to your bully
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
behavior and elect an
official that will work
for the people of the
Town of Cedar Lake
and their best interest.
Spam | Restore |
Delete Permanently
Select
commen
t
Doug Tylee
tyleedoug@gmail.com
24.183.123.25
The truth isn’t
Disrespectful.
Spam | Restore |
Delete Permanently
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsVie
w Post—No
comments
2022/09/2
0 at 5:45
pm
Select
commen
t
Christine
Cwilson9008@gmail.com
174.199.40.188
Ken Leners, it sure
looks like you
consider any opposing
opinion disrespect. If
you are successful in
driving out all of the
campers, who is going
to pay all the taxes and
beach club dues?
You? Or will you be
attempting to purchase
properties as they are
abandoned by those
that you consider
unwelcome?
I can assure you that
the county is getting
tired of your constant
badgering of people
and I wouldn’t be
surprised if
harassment suit isn’t
on the horizon for you.
Spam | Restore |
Delete Permanently
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsVie
w Post—No
comments
2022/09/2
0 at 5:12
pm
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
Select
commen
t
Phil Johnson
Youredina@gmail.com
99.196.129.201
In reply to Ken
Leners.
Ken, I believe you are
confusing disrespect
with dialogue. Just
because your opinion
is not accepted as
truth, does not
constitute banning of
dialogue.
Liz does not agree
with your stance.
Others do not agree
with your stance. I
have not stated my
stance. Who decides
who is allowed to
weigh in and what is
the your requirements
for what is deemed
acceptable vs banned
from commenting?
I am not a full time
resident. But am
taking note as I am
purchasing a second
home in Birchwood.
My family and I are
doing our best to buy
in to the culture and
community. That said,
if dialogue is not
allowed because you
can’t agree on
something, it has me
questioning the current
leadership in the area.
Free speech is free
speech, even if you do
not agree and even if
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsVie
w Post—No
comments
2022/09/2
0 at 4:53
pm
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
you feel someone
doesn’t like your
opinion.
Set rules and
regulations but allow
all dialog of the
community. If
something was
violated to constitute
banning of comments,
please elaborate. Your
feeling a of disrespect
do not constitute
banning of comments.
This is not a school
and you’re not the
principal.
Spam | Restore |
Delete Permanently
Select
commen
t
Bill Davis
billdavis_45@yahoo.com
141.126.152.34
MR LENERS
HOW IS IT YOU
CAN POST FLAT
OUT LIES AND
TOTALLY UNTRUE
NUMBERS ABOUT
EVERYTHING AND
WHEN SOMEONE
TRIES TO GIVE THE
CORRECT
INFORMATION OR
NUMBERS YOU
SHUT THEM DOWN
OR KICK THEM
OUT OF THE
MEETING ORWEB
SITE . YOUR THE
ONE. WHO NEEDS
TO BE REMOVED
FROM THE BOARD
FOR YOUR
ILLEGAL ACTIONS
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsVie
w Post—No
comments
2022/09/2
0 at 3:30
pm
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
YOU HAVE ON
STATE AND
FEDERAL LEVELS..
Spam | Restore |
Delete Permanently
Select
commen
t
Ken Leners
chairman@cedarlakets.com
173.248.48.122
In reply to Liz Young.
Liz Young – Your
disrespectful
comments will not be
tolerated. I will no
longer allow you to
comment on this site.
Spam | Restore |
Delete Permanently
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsVie
w Post—No
comments
2022/09/2
0 at 9:13
am
Select
commen
t
ken
chairman@cedarlakets.com
173.248.48.122
In reply to Liz
Schulte.
Liz Schulte – Your
disrespectful
comments will not be
tolerated. I will no
longer allow you to
comment on this site.
Spam | Restore |
Delete Permanently
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsVie
w Post—No
comments
2022/09/2
0 at 8:31
am
Select
commen
t
Liz Schulte
Lizschulte05@gmail.com
98.61.90.183
In reply to Thomas
Lee.
You bought in to the
area knowing how it
was zoned. The
developers had it
zoned that way from
day 1. If you don’t like
it leave!
Spam | Restore |
Delete Permanently
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsVie
w Post—No
comments
2022/09/1
9 at 8:00
pm
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
Select
commen
t
Connie Anderson
conbon1950@gmail.com
98.97.2.160
Campers at some
campgrounds in Ceder
lake township have
more rights than the
landowners in LLBC!
They are permitted to
leave their campers in
the camp site as long
as they want! We do
not use the roads
during the winter, but
we do help pay for the
garbage for LLBC all
year long with our
dues! We spend
money in a lot of
different communities
during the summer!
Why does this board
try to cause friction
with the people in
their township and
more laws and
regulation! Can we
work together in love
and trust!! Instead of
people coming on my
property without my
permission or taking
pictures without my
knowing! This is not
America or
Wisconsin! Let’s help
our neighbor when
they are in need!
Removing the campers
is an added expense to
our elderly and young
families! The board is
not thinking of their
fellow man but money
sure is trying to
control! Time to go
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsVie
w Post—No
comments
2022/09/1
9 at 11:55
am
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
back to the law of the
land! Constitutional
law not maritime law
that we have been
under for too long!
Spam | Restore |
Delete Permanently
Select
commen
t
Liz Young
learning2fly4@yahoo.com
73.5.145.85
In reply to Thomas
Lee.
Mr. Lee,
I suggest you look into
the characterizations
on “campground” in
the eyes of the state
and the county before
you come to the
conclusion that you
“live” in one. The
properties within
LLBC are privately
owned, ResidentialRecreational lots and
are categorized, zoned,
permitted and taxed as
such. They are NOT
campgrounds, and the
owners of those lots
should be given the
same rights as every
other LAND OWNER
in the township – a
“luxury” they are
currently NOT
afforded as many are
not allowed to vote or
have a say in any of
this (taxation without
representation?), are
required to pay
additional fees and
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsVie
w Post—No
comments
2022/09/1
9 at 8:46
am
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
have separate
permitting for their
every move. The
notion that you, and
others, like Chairman
Leners, think that a
classification of
individuals deserves
less than you speaks to
your complete lack of
empathy and shows
the dictator-like
arrogance by which
the township is
currently governed,
The citizens of the
area are far better than
that. Do better, Sir.
Spam | Restore |
Delete Permanently
Select
All
Author Comment In response
to
Submitte
d on
Select bulk action
29 items « ‹ Current Page1 of 2 Next page› Last page»
Comments
Filter comments list
 All (0) |
 Mine (0) |
 Pending (0) |
 Approved (0) |
 Spam (0) |
 Trash (29)
Search Comments:
Select bulk action
Filter by comment type
Comments list navigation
29 items First page« Previous page‹ Current Page
2
of 2 › »
Comments list
Select All
Author Comment In response to Submitted
on
Select
comment Thomas Lee
Tjl8869@gmail.com
47.12.255.106
What is moderation?
Spam | Restore | Delete
Permanently
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsView
Post—No
comments
2022/09/15
at 8:11 pm
Select
comment Thomas Lee
Tjl8869@gmail.com
174.199.74.234
Spot on! Now that the
lawsuit has been won
by the Plaintiffs maybe
the Town will take a
stance to rectify this
runaway freight train.
We do not and did not
plan to live in a
campground, there are
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsView
Post—No
comments
2022/09/14
at 4:50 pm
Select All
Author Comment In response to Submitted
on
places for everything
and the Judge ruled
that LLBC is not a
campground.
Spam | Restore | Delete
Permanently
Select
comment Liz Schulte
lizschulte05@gmail.com
65.132.218.218
Chairman Leners,
The fact that you
continue to
misrepresent the
situation in a public
forum shows your
entitled and
manipulative character.
I was born and raised
in Wisconsin and if
one thing is clear we
believe in property
rights for ALL
property owners. My
husband’s family
bought and has been
using their property in
the Loch Lomond area
since 1972. I have
been coming to the
area long before you
knew it existed. Yup
we do not pay as much
in taxes, but we do not
live in our campers on
our land and at most
only get to enjoy our
land 20% of the year,
and that percentage is
generous. Land
owner’s who use their
property for
recreational purposes
are under more rules
and regulations than
any campground and
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsView
Post—No
comments
2022/09/14
at 8:18 am
Select All
Author Comment In response to Submitted
on
don’t get to make back
what we pay yearly in
profits as campgrounds
do. We have to get
sanitation permits and
permits to have our
campers on our own
property yearly from
multiple institutions.
Our holding tanks,
which are required as
of 2022, are pumped
and maintained more
than any regular septic
systems. If there was
an issue with sanitation
the pumper/haulers
would have made the
issue known. You
continue to inflate
numbers. Many of us
own mulitple lots and
only have a single
camper on 1 of them.
You and your friends
bought in to this area
knowing the zoning
and now you want to
change it… not
because there is a
sanitation issue but
because you don’t
want to see happy
families camping and
enjoying the use of
their land. You talk
about zoning
violations… however
these have been proven
to be nothing more
than complaints by
your friends. I would
like to see your proof
that those unfounded
Select All
Author Comment In response to Submitted
on
complaints were more
than just harrassment.
You continue to lie and
misrepresent the
situation to manipulate
others. I know that the
residents of Cedar
Lake who were raised
and continue to live
there see that you are
only interested in
pushing this agenda for
a few entitled and
greedy individuals.
Liz Schulte
Spam | Restore | Delete
Permanently
Select
comment Joe Schulte
Joeschulte05@gmail.com
174.199.34.201
Chairman Lenord,
Thanks for sharing
your personal opinion.
Your characterization
of Land use as
“unlicensed campsites”
is blatantly false. In
fact it is approved in
accordance with local
zoning.
Joe
Spam | Restore | Delete
Permanently
Update on
Recreational
Residential
DwellingsView
Post—No
comments
2022/09/14
at 7:55 am
Select
comment Joyce Schiefelbein
joyceschiefelbein@yahoo.com
184.97.223.147
I can’t seem to access
the Zoom meeting.
Spam | Restore | Delete
Permanently
Zoom mtg invite
Town of Cedar
Lake Apr 11,
2022 6:30 p.m.
monthly board
mtgView Post—
No comments
2022/04/11
at 6:57 pm
Select All
Author Comment In response to Submitted
on
Select
comment Paula Hentges
hentgesp@yahoo.com
68.249.191.192
Is the meeting
recorded
Spam | Restore | Delete
Permanently
NOTICE TOWN
OF CEDAR
LAKE
RESIDENTS |
March 14,
2022View Post—
No comments
2022/03/15
at 8:29 pm
Select
comment Robin Carlson
echo143rlc@aol.com
184.100.10.126
Is this ordinance what
you are proposing for
the Town of Cedar
Lake? Will the public
be allowed input on
this ordinance if it is
what you are
proposing? What are
the details of Barron
County’s camping
ordinance and are there
several choices for our
county?
Spam | Restore | Delete
Permanently
Town of Bass
Lake camping
permits and fees
ordinanceView
Post—No
comments
2021/09/13
at 1:10 pm
Select
comment John (Mike) Stenseth
johnnymike530@gmail.com
184.97.20.82
Is the township
planning on doing any
snow plowing in the
Loch Lomond
development anytime
in the near future? Side
roads are getting tough
to maneuver in a car.
Thanks in advance for
all you do as plow
drivers and the terrific
job done for us so far
this winter.
Spam | Restore | Delete
Permanently
Town Meeting |
January 13th,
2020View Post—
No comments
2020/01/26
at 10:32
am
Select
comment Kathi Mintari
rustcmsn@yahoo.com
184.100.112.18
I recently heard that
the Federal Govt
requires home delivery
to veterans who
Notice To Cedar
Lake Town
residents who
had a P.O. Box at
2019/10/30
at 2:30 pm
Select All
Author Comment In response to Submitted
on
receive narcotics via
mail. Can you find out
if this is true and if so,
would that give us/ any
vet in Mikana any
leverage?
Also, wouldn’t our
Town Hall liability
insurance already
include any placement
of mail containers, and
therefore not be an
additional cost?
Spam | Restore | Delete
Permanently
the Mikana
StoreView
Post—No
comments
Select All
Author Comment In response to Submitted
on
Select bulk action
29 items First page« Previous page‹ Current Page2 of 2 ›